Articles Posted in Theft Crimes

Not too far from Boston is the town of Natick. Natick had a couple of problems this past Tuesday evening. One of those problems got away. The other one, Aretha B., 33 of Worcester (hereinafter, the “Defendant”) did not. She was arrested, given a free trip to the local courthouse, the services of an attorney and a new court date.

The incident happenned at Neiman Marcus.

According to a security officer, he saw the pair( the Defendant and an as-yet unidentified gentleman) walking around the store. At some point, said gentleman took an expensive belt off the rack, handed it to the Defendant, who hid it in her jacket.

They left the store, and the guard confronted them.

According to police spokesman Lt. Brian Grassey, the lovely couple struggled with the security officer, the gentleman trying to free the Defendant from the grip of the officer. Apparently, there is a security video which depicts the struggle.

The store security officer was nonetheless able to grab the Defendant and bring her back to the police officer. The video shows her accomplice walking off.
Continue reading

Police in Massachusetts say they believe that the increase in car break-ins, burglaries, scams, larcenies, and domestic violence crimes throughout the state can be attributed to the recent economic crisis. For example, the Boston Globe is reporting that in:

• Lawrence, Massachusetts: Burglaries have already increased by 52% compared to last year.
• Lowell, Massachusetts: There has been a 21% increase in thefts and larcenies, as well as an increase in fraud cases.
• Hingham, Massachusetts: Between October 2008 through February 2009, there were 57 reports of domestic violence-related crimes (up from 35 domestic violence incidents the year prior).
• Boston, Massachusetts: While large crimes are down throughout the city, certain areas have seen an increase in robberies, thefts, and burglaries.
• Between January 1 through March 1, 2009, the Suffolk district attorney’s office assessed 256 child abuse cases, which is almost twice the number of cases reported for the same period in 2008.

According to police, loss of work, loss of income, foreclosures, and loss of quality of life may be leading to desperation, frustration, anger, stress, arguments and fights between couples and business partners, drinking, and drugs.

Police departments throughout Massachusetts are also reporting some unusual crimes that could be a further reflection of the tough times that people are facing:

• A Ludlow bank was robbed two times in a little over a year in a town that hadn’t experienced a bank robbery in 20 years.
• In Hingham, one man was accused of assaulting his spouse after he was laid off from work.
• One Quincy theft crime that occurred last December involved robbers taking three snowplow blades.
Domestic violence programs throughout Massachusetts are reporting an increase in the number of battered women asking for help.

It doesn’t help that the economic crisis is forcing police departments to cut back on budgets, which means there are less resources and staff to deal with the increase in Massachusetts crimes.

Economy fuels rise in crime, police say, Boston.com, March 10, 2009
Massachusetts Crime Rates 1960 – 2007, Disaster Center
Related Web Resources:
Massachusetts State Police
Continue reading

It’s been awhile since we checked in on the Bernie Madoff, the latest superstar of the Boston-created ponzi scheme. Once a larger-than-life society figure, he is now reduced to spending his time in his larger-than-life New York apartment, talking to his attorneys and hoping to avoid a smaller-than-life jail cell. As predicted by this daily blog many times, however, the finger of suspicion and blame in this case is too large for just one man.

For example, we have already explored in earlier postings (look under the blog’s White Collar Crimes section to review) the pressures brought upon out-of-state Madoff associates to come up to Boston to answer questions by regulators. We have also witnessed how the regulators themselves have been on and off the hot seat. Then, there have been questions about Madoff’s wife and her habits with the United States Postal service.

Now, as sensitivities to this kind of thing have grown, a Massachusetts man has been accused of stealing $57 million from the descendants of a 19th century industrialist and using the money on personal extravagances, including three private jets.
John D. , 60, of Topsfield (hereinafter, “New Defendant”) was charged in a federal indictment Wednesday of assessing millions in phony fees, transferring company funds to himself and hiding the theft with various schemes, including false financial statements. New Defendant faces up to 20 years in prison, if convicted for the Massachusetts white collar crimes.

The U.S. Attorney’s office said in the indictment that New Defendant had stolen “more than $20 million” from Tenens Corporation, which was created to manage trusts for more than 100 descendants of the late Frederick Ayer Jr., who owned textile mills in Lowell. In a May 2008 lawsuit by Tenens against its auditors, the company estimated the theft at $57 million. Tenens attorney said New Defendant “looted” the family and “joins the likes of disgraced money manager Madoff…The family is heartbroken by [New Defendant’s] personal betrayal, and stunned by the scope and audacity of his criminal acts”.
Continue reading

Hey, guess what? It turns out there are law enforcement officials in Boston who Believe that there are actually crimes more heinous than prostitution! Today, we salute the local United States Attorney’s Office for deciding that extortion is worse than the world’s oldest profession.

He (his name has been withheld, but we’ll call him “John”) is a prominent businessman from the Boston area, married and in his 60s, who later told authorities that he had merely wanted a “last hurrah” – sex with a young woman.

And he got it. She ( who has been named) was 27-year-old Michelle R (hereinafter, the “Defendant”). The Defendant is alleged to be a prostitute from Canton who was happy to oblige John’s “hurrah”. Through an escort service, John and the Defendant made a deal. Well, kind of several deals. They all involved sex for money as one encounter led to another, and then another, and so on.

The “hurrah” allegedly lasted for 18 months.

But then, it ended. According to the FBI, however, the Defendant figured that if she could not do it to him one way, she would do it to him another way. This past July, shortly after the liaisons ended, she allegedly called John and explained that someone had offered her $60,000 to publicly reveal their relationship. So, if John wanted her to keep her mouth shut, he would have to pay him more than that.
Continue reading

This February began as “Weapons Gathering Month” as far as local police are concerned. We return to two warnings often read in the daily Boston Criminal Lawyer Blog. Namely…(1) different law enforcements agencies communicate and (2) you do not get advance notice that an investigation is going on.

No, I am not referring to the cache of weapons in a Worcester home that were discovered when police and an ambulance were called due to a medical emergency this weekend. The month’s gun-toting atmosphere predated that.

A joint investigation by five area towns resulted in the arrest and arraignment in the beginning days of February of a Maynard man on charges of stealing and trying to sell firearms, including some assault rifles.

Lawrence W., 24, (hereinafter, the “Defendant”) was arrested as a result of an ongoing investigation according to Marlborough Detective Lt. Robert Jusseaume, one of the investigators in the case. The investigation included police from Maynard, Marlborough, Hudson, Sudbury and Newton, he said.

“We were able to pool information and resources and we were able to, based on our investigation, establish probable cause that a cache of weapons was stored at house in Maynard,” Jusseaume said.

“It originated with a burglary in Newton over the summer,” Jusseaume said. “Numerous weapons, including assault rifles, were taken.”
Continue reading

This week, the daily Boston Criminal Lawyer Blog ends its week as it began…with stories which demonstrate dangers faced by law enforcement and defendants applying to the “Hey, I’ll Bet I Can Make This Situation Worse” club.

Today, we have tales out of Springfield where two police officers suffered injuries Wednesday night while making two unrelated routine arrests.

Officer Francisco Otero suffered a severely injured shoulder while subduing a shoplifter during a violent struggle at Wal-Mart and Officer Maciej Jasinski suffered a severely injured knee while tackling a suspect in an icy parking lot.

Sgt. John M. Delaney, aide to Police Commissioner William J. Fitchet, said both officers required hospital treatment and have been relieved from duty.

Otero was sent to the Boston Road Wal-Mart, at about 8 p.m., for a report of a shoplifting in progress, Delaney said. Once inside, Otero was greeted by the store manager and security who stated they were monitoring a suspect who had a straight razor and was removing cell phones from their packaging and placing them in his pocket.
Continue reading

As the “Madoff Wars”, fought by investigators, attorneys and accountants, rage, score one for lawyers of the Commonwealth. They finally got Robert Jaffe, a crucial witness to Madoff’s operation, to the Hub where he finally spoke to regulators. The result? Boston regulators are ramping up a probe into Bernard Madoff’s alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme.

As any loyal reader to this daily blog knows, we have been “checking in” with the Madoff Nightmare since the beginning. In our last episode, January 27ths Boston Secretary Of State Tells Madoff Associate To Visit; Attorney Says “Nope”., the Commonwealth and the court were telling him to come up from Florida to talk. Through counsel, his response had been in the negative.
Apparently, he has changed his mind. Yesterday, he met with state investigators. It is not clear whether Jaffe, who went to court last month in a failed bid to block the state’s subpoena, told regulators anything of value, however.

Jaffe, a vice president at Madoff’s Cohmad Securities unit, introduced many alleged Massachusetts scam victims to Madoff. However, the 64-year-old has denied any knowledge of the reputed Ponzi scheme. Rather, Jaffe – the son-in-law of Hub philanthropist Carl Shapiro, who allegedly lost some $300 million in the scam – has said that he and his family are among Madoff’s victims.

“The responsiveness of Mr. Jaffe to (our) subpoena is presently being evaluated,” said State Secretary Galvin, whose office regulates Massachusetts securities sales. However, Galvin did say that his probe has expanded to include other “feeder firms” – companies that lined up Madoff investors.
Continue reading

..And now, let’s check in with the Bernard Madoff case, as we periodically do in this daily blog. You remember 70-year-old Bernie…admitted white collar criminal mastermind of the Boston-created Ponzi scheme that ended up bilking about fifty billion dollars from philanthropies, hospitals, rich people, poor people, charities, etc., across the country and, indeed, the globe.

When last we left Bernie, he and his lawyer were trying to prevent the government from convincing the court to have him await trial in jail instead of being in a probationary state in his luxury apartment. Guess what? He won that round.

You may recall I had predicted that, with a catastrophe this large, the finger of accusation would not be satisfied with just one man. Well, those who were supposed to have been regulating people like Bernie have been lounging around in the hot seat. But, now, it is someone else’s turn.

Robert Jaffe was a 64-year-old business associate of Bernie’s. He helped raise millions of dollars for Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities (BMIS) from Boston and Palm Beach’s wealthy social sets. He was vice-president of Cohmad Securities, a brokerage that was 20 per cent owned by Madoff. Cohmad paid commissions to financial advisers who steered cash to Madoff’s fund. He is also the son-in-law of Carl Shapiro, 95, a Boston philanthropist who is said to have lost $545 million invested with Madoff.

There are a number of investigations going on, both criminal and civil, regarding the Madoff Nightmare. Mr. Jaffe is currently being sought for his turn in the limelight. Unfortunately, he does not seem to want to go.
Continue reading

Let the games begin! As local as Boston and as distant as the globe will reach! The adventure of pointing fingers and looking for bodies to blame, as expected, has begun. Defense Attorneys for everybody! Everybody pays!

Bernard Madoff (hereinafter, the “Defendant”), talking in 2001 about what fed the Internet bubble said “You had a lot of novice investors who got into the market looking for easy money, without any regard to the fundamentals. These stocks were running on fumes.”

You would almost think that the Defendant did not have a lot of faith in investors, regulatory agencies such as the Security Exchange Commission and the market in general, wouldn’t you?

Well, I guess now we know why. He, himself, was apparently engaged in a huge fraud and getting away with it.

Unless you have been living under a rock for the past couple of weeks, you have heard that the Defendant is accused of devestated the international economic world, when it was already reeling, through what is alleged to be a fifty billion dollar scam, the largest such fraud in history. For more background information, you may want to check out Tuesday’s blog, entitled, Boston Is Hit, Along With The Rest Of The Country, By Financial Guru And His Use Of A Boston-Originated Method Of Fraud (The Madoff Nightmare Part One.

The question of what to do next appears to be a nasty little thing for which there is no clear answer. Therefore, filling that vacuum, we move to other, and perhaps more lucrative, questions. The questions include such topics as how any scam of this size could remain a secret for so long, who was involved, who else is out there doing similar things and, of course, who got off easy.

In short, the questions are “Who else can we blame?” and perhaps more importantly, “Who else can help finance the cleanup?”

Hey, it’s what we do.
Continue reading

This holiday season, so many religions and traditions call for gift-giving. Sometimes, those gifts are a big surprise. One gentleman from out of state has been given a surprise gift from the government because of the gifts he has given throughout the country, including the Boston area, big time. The gift he received is the need of a criminal defense attorney. The wide-spread gift he gave? Well, that would be the gift of financial ruin.

You already know his name. It is Bernard Madoff (hereinafter, the “Defendant”). He is a 70-year-old former chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market, who has now been awarded the country’s bracelets of shame. Last Thursday, he taken out of his house by United States marshals and charged with securities fraud by federal authorities.

Ironically, the Defendant’s gift of restraints and forced government housing was connected to charity and gift work throughout the nation. His actions have apparently brought about the destruction and near-destruction of various charities and philanthropies throughout the country. That’s right….that means fewer gifts for the under-privileged. It also means the same thing for victims of every financial level because they all have one thing in common now. They have been victims of white collar crime in a big way to the tune of approximately fifty billion dollars.

Such a loss is kind of hard to swallow, especially in such difficult economic times. Actually, it was the market’s recent crash that finally brought the Defendant’s alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme to light. The Defendant himself is said to have “come clean”. He has admitted that his money management operations were “all just one big lie” and “a giant Ponzi scheme.” .

You may be unfamilier with the term “Ponzi scheme”. For those so uninitiated, it is a fraudulent investment operation that involves paying abnormally high profits to investors out of the money paid in by subsequent investors, rather than from net revenues generated by any real business. It is named after Charles Ponzi who apparently introduced the scheme to the United States in the early 1900’s from…of all places…Boston. Because the invested capital is not earning a sufficient return on its own, Ponzi schemes usually eventually collapse under their own weight.

So much for a “I never thought it could happen…” , or, perhaps more formally, “Whodathunkit” defense.
Continue reading

Contact Information