Over the past months in the daily Boston Criminal Lawyer Blog, I have been spend a lot of time suggesting to potential defendants the best way to respond to police officers at the time of impending arrest. In fact, last Thursday, our weekly “Attorney Sam’s Take” posting about issues in criminal justice, was devoted to the issue. I have warned you about not trying to outwit, outfight or out-run the police. Unfortunately, I have neglected to warn people about avoiding the officers’ means of transportation. Now, perhaps because of this neglect, Todd D., a 31-year-old homeless gentleman from Springfield (hereinafter, “Defendant1”) needs a lawyer.

The event took place last Thursday morning at Springfield’s Worthington Street parking lot.

Yes, Defendant1 is said to have broken into the car in front of police officers so that they could witness it.

Yes, it was a police car…although unmarked.
Continue reading

You’ve heard of Costco, haven’t you? It is a very popular chain of stores that specializes in cost-cutting by purchasing in volume. You know, why buy one box of napkins when you can by 80 and get a bargain in the process? It looks like some Boston-area entrepreneurs took the idea alittle too far this week. And, in case you are wondering, no, one cannot retain attorneys in bulk…although two North Shore gentlemen may wish one could.

It was in the Costco parking lot on Route 1. It was Wednesday at noon. And it was, according to law enforcement, more than 500 pounds of marijuana that was recovered.

How much is 500 pounds? Well, you know that new law that says it is no longer a crime to have a “small amount” of marihuana for your own use? Well, this would be over 8,000 x that amount.

Probably not a simple error in measurement.

The Massachusetts State Police believes that the operation was a large-scale narcotics delivery in Danvers.

The troopers set up surveillance in the parking lot in connection with an ongoing investigation. According to the officers, Brian T., 42 of Revere (“Defendant Greeter”) arrived in a rented truck as Phillip W., 37, of Saugus (“Defendant Lookout”) acted as the lookout. Then, occupants of a tractor-trailer with Indiana license plates met with Defendant Greeter.
Continue reading

Once again, you are being arrested in Boston. Maybe you are out for a “night out on the town” and the town, and its inhabitants, has turned on you. Perhaps you are carrying something that has been branded as illegal…such as a gun or some drugs. Maybe there is a warrant out for your arrest and, for some reason, those police officers on the corner are looking at you kinda funny. Whatever the circumstances are, members of law enforcement are coming to approach you and they are not baring gifts…except for the Commonwealth’s Bracelets of Shame. Oh, how you wish you had your lawyer standing right beside you.

But you don’t.

You are on your own until you can get to the experienced criminal defense attorney whom you long ago learned from this daily blog you should consult.

What to do.

In today’s weekly Thursday Attorney Sam’s Take, we look at these crucial moments during which time you will decide how to respond to the approaching officers. If you are a regular reader to this blog, you probably know a lot of what I am about to tell you already. However, it is worth reviewing, since getting it wrong could cost you a lot of years.
Continue reading

In Lynn District Court, teenager Jonathan Caruso attended his arraignment on Monday, pleading not guilty to charges of negligent vehicle homicide, being a minor transporting liquor, and operating under the influence of alcohol in the deadly pedestrian accident that killed a 67-year-old woman and seriously injured her daughter early Saturday morning. Caruso, 18, is a Saugus High School senior who had stayed out all night with friends after attending his prom the night before.

The deadly Massachusetts pedestrian accident occurred at Grove and Essex streets. A police report indicates that Caruso told them that he had been drinking and may have fallen asleep while driving. He says he regained consciousness after hitting a street sign. A friend who was in the car told him that he had struck two pedestrians. Caruso, who took a breath analysis test after the Saugus car accident, registered a .02% BAC. The legal limit for Massachusetts drivers under 21 is .02%.

Carol Marean died from her pedestrian injuries. Her 41-year-old daughter, Charlotte, sustained critical injuries. The two of them had gone out that morning to walk their dog.

The judge ordered the teenager held on $7,500 cash bail. Caruso will also have to abide by a 7pm to 7am curfew and go back to court in July for a pretrial hearing.

A Massachusetts OUI/DWI/DUI offense is a serious offense in the state-especially if someone was injured or killed as a result of the alleged drunk driving incident. An experienced Boston DUI lawyer can protect your rights and comb through all of the evidence to make sure that the best avenues of defense are available to you.

The more serious the criminal charges against you, the greater the penalties and the longer the sentencing periods that could await you. You need a good Massachusetts criminal defense law firm working for you.

Student arraigned in death of pedestrian, Boston.com, May 19, 2009
Friends: Teen Accused In Fatal DUI No, WCVB, May 18, 2009
Read the Police Accident Report, Boston.com (PDF)”

Related Web Resources:
Police arrest 34 people, many teens, in get tough move on public drunkenness at Comcast Center concert in Mansfield, Enterprise News, May 19, 2009 Continue reading

Mr. John F., 32 of Quincy (hereinafter, the “Defendant”), needs a good lawyer.

According to law enforcement, his home housed some ill-advised contents. As a result, he is now being described as a mid-level drug dealer.

On Monday night, around 6:00pm, police raided the Defendant’s home. The Commonwealth claims that a search of the home resulted in the seizure of approximately 20 grams of crack, cocaine and weapons including two shotguns, one which had a sawed-off barrel, a 9 millimeter handgun with a defaced serial number and hollow-point bullets.

The Defendant himself was not found in the actual house. He was allegedly found in a detached garage where two shotguns and a Sig Sauer semi-automatic handgun were also discovered.

Police also indicate they found a box containing $1,100 in cash located above a suspended basement ceiling as well as another $1,700 in a bedroom, along with the 20 grams of crack found in the bedroom closet.
Continue reading

David Frank, of Boston’s Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, has reported this week on a story that has become achingly familiar. It involves the issue of the wrongfully convicted.

Ulysses C. (hereinafter, the “Defendant”) is now 59 years old. On May 17, 2001, he was released from prison after serving 19 years of an 80 year sentence for unlawful confinement, rape and robbery. He was released from custody after DNA testing on the physical evidence used against him exonerated him of the crimes for which he was convicted.

But, then, what does “exonerated” really mean? Does it clear a man’s name? Can it give him back the nineteen years he unjustly lost at the hands of the Commonwealth?

In recent years, a number of criminal defendants have been convicted, only to be released after having served many years, after DNA evidence was discovered which showed that they were not, in fact, guilty.

Interestingly, District Attorneys still try to fight attempts by convicted defendants to have DNA tested for some reason, which is odd given their sworn oath to “do Justice”.
Continue reading

Being a police officer in the big city can be dangerous. We all know that. Logan Airport, of course, is within the limits of the city of Boston. So, it is not too shocking that it can be a dangerous place. Usually, though, that danger does not come inside the packaging of a Mercedes Benz SUV and presented by a Wellesley businesswoman.

It did in March, though.

Last week, she resolved the matter.

She apologized.

Of course, “my bad” was not the first reaction that Margaret G., a 57-year-old portfolio manager and former Wellesley school board member (hereinafter, the “Defendant”) offered to law enforcement in this matter.
Continue reading

This week ends as last week ended. From Boston to Providence, and beyond, law makers and enforcers are struggling with how to address the problems presented by the so-called “Craigslist Killer” (hereinafter, “CLK”). The case grows almost daily as he is now facing murder charges in Massachusetts and assault/robbery charges in Rhode Island. One would imagine that prosecuting attorneys, politicians and law enforcement would be concentrating on bringing CLK to trial and working to prevent such murders.

…And you would be wrong.

Instead, the response seems to be to attack the victims’ profession and method of advertisement. In other words, do everything possible to keep sex workers like the victims in the shadows of society so that they can continue to be easy victims to people like Jack The Ripper and CLK.

The Massachusetts CLK case was the crime of murder. The Rhode Island Matter involved assault and robbery. The victims were both of the sex industry and they purportedly met CLK through the website Craigslist.com. There are no allegations of any sexual acts, voluntary or forced, having been a component on CLK’s violent crimes.

Yet, somehow, the matter is being treated as if it were about the sex trade.
Somehow, the work of a twisted killer has become the fault of the profession of prostitution as well as Craigslist’s posting of ads which have, it turns out, sometimes been fronts for said trade.

And so, this past Wednesday apparently marked a great victory for humanity everywhere. Justice is finally being done and we are one step closer to murder-free.
Continue reading

You are arrested in Massachusetts. Being an avid reader of the daily Boston Criminal Law Blog, you know that what you do in the next few minutes could mean the difference between sleeping at home or at the local jail for the next few weeks. You remember that there were a variety of postings that had talked about things that could help and things that could hurt your chances at being released on low bail. But it was always about this story or that story…never a simple overview about bail and what determines an arrestee’s bail conditions.

Until now, that is.

In this, the latest edition of our weekly Thursday Attorney Sam’s Take, where we discuss certain issues facing people in the criminal justice system, we tackle the pre-trial release question.

Most people have heard about a “right to bail”. However, that “right” has been compromised over the years as the courts have been weighing it against the rest of the community’s rights.

The issue of bail is chiefly about the question of whether a criminal defendant is likely to return to court to answer the charges against him or her as it proceeds, over the next several months, to trial. The theory is that if the court is holding some of the defendant’s money, then the defendant will be less likely to flee. Therefore, at a bail hearing, one hears the prosecutor giving all the reasons the defendant to believe the defendant will not come back to court, while the defense attorney argues all the reasons to believe he will return to court.

While the strength of government’s case will likely be argued, it is not the real issue in a bail hearing. Therefore, simply arguing the facts as if the underlying case had now gone to trial, alone, is not that much help. However, it is relevant if one can persuade the court that the case against the defendant is weak and therefore he has every reason to want to return to challenge the non-existing evidence and clear his name.

This is the same reasoning in considering the seriousness of the case. For example, if the defendant has been charged with murder, considered the most serious of cases and punishable by either life imprisonment without parole or, in the federal system, the death penalty, the courts consider that these potential outcomes are usually enough reason to make a defendant not want to return for the outcome. These kinds of cases are among the few times a defendant can be held without bail for actual bail purposes.
Continue reading

It has been awhile since the daily Boston Criminal Lawyer Blog has received news from the “Hey, I’ll Bet I Can Make This Situation Worse” Club. Months ago, their members appeared quite frequently in my postings. Not to worry, though. They are back and one unfortunate member needs a criminal lawyer.

The story may strike you as familiar.

This incident took place yesterday, May 12th. The previous incident to which I refer was the subject of this blog on March 12th.

Yesterday’s scene, according to the Boston Herald, took place at the Natick Collection mall. A couple were out together, enjoying enjoying an afternoon of nice weather and theft. Lt. Brian Grassey says that, at approximately 4:00pm, two plainclothes detectives from Natick police were at the mall “and made observations of what appeared to be a store larceny unfolding right in front of them.”

In other words, shoplifting.

The suspects were a man and a woman. Mall security chased the couple from a Sunglass Hut. When the woman was detained, the gentleman decided the date was over and took off. She has been charged with shoplifting in excess of $100 and conspiracy.

While the gentleman’s evening activities with his lady-friend may have been over…the officers felt that they were deserving of some quality time with him too. They followed the man outside and detectives saw him get into his car to leave the area.
Continue reading

Contact Information