We began this week talking about Massachusetts campus crimes and offenses and how they were handled in two particular incidents.

In both cases, people have raised the question of whether the punishments were fair.
In one of the cases, those punished have actually brought a civil lawsuit against the school claiming that the punishment was not fair and they were not guilty to begin with.

Despite what the breathalyzer might have said.

If you have no involvement in either of these two cases, you might be wondering why we are talking about it in a criminal law blog.

Let’s see if I can’t answer that question…

Attorney Sam’s Take On School Accusation, Punishment And The Scholastic Record

First of all, although neither of these cases have been pursued in criminal court, one of them at least could have been. That would be the girls accused of drinking. Given that they are high school students, I am going to take a wild guess and assume that they are under the age of 21 years old.

To accuse them of drinking alcohol is to accuse them of committing a crime. Therefore, the school could have called the police at the time they were posted from the dance.

“Well Sam, they were suspended. That went on this school record. Isn’t that just as bad?”

Continue reading

Sometimes Massachusetts criminal or juvenile defendants strike back!

The Attorney Sam’s Take blogs have often discussed the plight of the young who find themselves faced with crimes or school offenses. We began the week with Harvard University’s latest cheating scandal. High School campuses have their own share of campus crimes.

Some say it is fair…others unfair. But whoever controls the record, criminal or scholastic, wins.

Or do they?

I have long bemoaned the fact that, however such cases end, as soon as such defendants are arraigned, the matter is entered upon their criminal/juvenile record. Usually, whether or not the allegations are said to have taken place on school property, there are also school ramifications which are then listed on the school record.

With either or both markings of records, the future is suddenly bleak for the accused who will have to address the listings for the forseeable future.

Now, two such Weymouth High School seniors are awaiting trial in a civil lawsuit they have brought against the school system. They have sued the school system over their breathalyzer-related suspensions after the homecoming dance. they say that they are eager for their day in court.

Among other things, the cases drawn public attention to the use of alcohol detecting tests.

You see, the girls were suspended for nine days “under the guise of a so-called zero tolerance policy” which the students claim violated their due process and civil rights. They say that they had not been drinking and they want this school records expunged in the legal costs paid. The lawsuit is pending in Norfork Superior Court.

The Weymouth School Department denies any wrongdoing and won the first legal battle, convincing a judge not to impose a temporary restraining order preventing punishment.

“The school district is entitled to a substantial deference in the imposition of discipline,” Judge Kenneth J. Fishman wrote in his November 16th decision.
Continue reading

Last week, Friday brought some disturbing news to the students at Cambridge’s Harvard University. If you are a regular reader to this blog, you probably Saw this news as Inevitable. While not technically a college crime, it is close enough.

You may Recognize the allegations in this story from our discussion of it back in August 2012. It was then that Harvard announced that a cheating scandal had taken place at the University.

According to Harvard, the cheating scandal took place in the spring, 2012, class, “Government 1310: Introduction to Congress.”

This was not a scandal which involved merely a couple of students. It was a rather widespread problem. Over 100 students type of widespread problem.

Now, the announcement has come from a top university official that more than half of the students investigated by a college board have been ordered to withdraw from the school.
In an e-mail to the Harvard community, Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Michael D. Smith wrote that more than half of the students who were brought before the university’s Administration Board this fall were required to withdraw from school for a period of time.

Of the remaining cases, approximately half the students received disciplinary probation, while the rest of the cases were dismissed.

Smith added that the first set of cases were decided in late September, and the remainder were resolved in December.
Continue reading

Ricardo Pavao Is a Somerset police officer. Well, at least he was. Now he is hereinafter referred to as the “defendant”.

The Defendant is now facing criminal charges of larceny and drug possession. More specifically, He stands accused of going to peoples homes at an elderly housing complex, asking for personal information, and offering to collect and dispose of expired prescription medication.

“So what’s the problem?” You might ask. Well, it turns out that he was not authorized to do this.

“Well”, you might respond, “perhaps he is new on the force and didn’t know any better.”

Unfortunately, he has been on the force for about 10 years. He’s also 33 years old.

The criminal charges he faces are two counts of possession a Class E drug, two counts of possession of a Class C drug and one count of larceny under $250 under false pretenses, according to court documents. The case is pending at Fall River District Court. The Defendant was released, and the hearing was continued for a pretrial hearing on March 28.

You may be wondering what the defendant did with the drugs. For example, did he sell them to somebody else?

Nope.

Did he keep them and use them himself?

Uh-uh.

Did he even keep them?

Despite the search warrant that was executed, there’s nothing to indicate that. Although, he did have a small, not illegal, amount of marijuana Continue reading

Yesterday, Attorney Sam’s Take began discussing the plight of a certain Mr. Galant (hereinafter the “Defendant”) in connection with certain federal criminal allegations which allegedly took place in the Dominican republic. They involved various sex crimes involving children.

Over the last years, we have discussed many federal cases and how they usually built. If you take the international aspect of this matter out of it, this case seems to be a typical federal prosecution. Not that the Commonwealth never uses such tactics, but the federal prosecutors have built it to an art form.

Just tell me you haven’t heard this one before…

Suspect A comes into contact with law-enforcement. Suspect A is in possession of stolen materials. Suspect A is in trouble. However, suspect A says that she knows about suspect D, and suspect D has committed even greater crimes. And, by the way, suspect A is a critical witness against suspect D.

Isn’t that what happened in this case? The 14-year-old young lady (Hereinafter the “Girl”) Was found in possession of the Defendant’s credit card and withdrawing money from his account. She then explained how he had apparently broken their agreements and had illicit sexual relations with her and a couple of friends.

“But Sam, are you saying that the only evidence against the defendant is what the complainant said happened?”

No. Apparently, photographs were seized which reflected the Girll in positions which made the photographs child pornography. Further, I would imagine that federal investigators were able to find other evidence which supported the Girl’s claims. An example of this would be airline tickets that the Defendant used on his trips to the Dominican Republic. .

However, the start of this information leads back to the Girl. Further, without her testimony, these prosecutions cannot be made successfully.

“I was under the impression that the case is only prosecuted in the jurisdiction in which it happens. In other words, Massachusetts would not prosecute a case where the fax took place in California. Here, it seems like the United States is prosecuting a case where the facts occurred, or allegedly occurred, in the Dominican Republic. What gives?”

Continue reading

Shrewsbury’s unfortunate-named Conrad Gallant (hereinafter, the “Defendant”) had an interesting take on “What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. “.

The alleged result?

Federal criminal charges for various sex crimes.

Last Friday, the Defendant pleaded not guilty to charges that he traveled to the Dominican Republic to have sex with underage girls. The 62-year-old Defendant was now in federal court in Worcester. He faces charges including sexual exploitation of children and engaging in illicit sexual conduct in foreign places. He allegedly traveled to the county to have sex with minors at least four times between February 2011 and March, 2012, When he was arrested.

He is being held without bail.

The Defendant is accused of carrying on an affair with a 14-year-old Dominican girl(hereinafter, the “Girl”) for approximately one year.

Not that this one girl was enough, mind you. Apparently, he needed two more.

According to authorities, the matter came to light when National Tourist Police in the Dominican Republic encountered the Girl at a bus stop in Bavaro-Higuey. She explained to the police that she had stolen the Defendant’s credit card and withdrew 26,000 Dominican pesos, the equivalent of $671, after they had sex. He had, after all, promised to give her 20,000 Dominican pesos to take her mother to the doctor, but that did not quite work out as arranged. He did not give her the money.

The Girl continued to tell the authorities about the year-long relationship which purportedly began in February, 2011. She explained that she had even lived with the Defendant for two days at an apartment and engaged in sexual acts with him before he returned home to Massachusetts.

Which is where he is said to live in his ex-wife’s home.
Continue reading

During the last few years of Attorney Sam’s Takes, I have pointed out many times that cases that used to be handled by civil lawsuits have now entered the criminal justice arena. I have opined that part of the reason for this is that these cases, or at least the prosecution of them, brings headlines and publicity that political prosecutors are looking to get.

No where has this been more noteworthy then in the areas of theft and fraud. Most of the cases that we see have to do with politicians and/or fraud against public agencies. These cases often include wire fraud, insurance fraud, mail fraud, Social Security fraud and so on. I would imagine that since the World Wide Web is our latest “out West” area, as we learn more about it, there will not only be more Internet crimes, but also more prosecutions.

The fact is, fraud took place long before we had an Internet. It was not always prosecuted as a crime however. Often, the matter was resolved by a civil lawsuit.

For example, let’s say I make a deal with someone that I am going to sell them a book of my blogs for which they will pay an insane amount of money. I live in the Boston area and my purchaser lives in Toledo Ohio. I sent him the book and he sends me a check.

The check bounces.

Now, I cannot reach the gentleman no matter what mode of communication I try. What do I do?
Continue reading

When we left off yesterday, Attorney Sam’s Take was discussing the concept of conspiracies. In a criminal conspiracy one merely needs to act in furtherance of the overall conspiracy in order to be charged as being part of that conspiracy. Let’s assume, for example, that there is a drug trafficking conspiracy going on between Boston, Massachusetts, and Barbados. In the conspiracy, the drugs are brought in from Barbados in flown to various locations in the United States. In one particular event, the plane needs to land in Boston.

Let’s say that Freddy Flyer owns an airplane which he keeps, naturally, in an airplane hangar. Let’s also say he makes an arrangement with the drug delivery man to have his plane out of the hanger on a given night so that they can park the drugs in there while they preparing them for sale. In such a case, Freddy would be part of the drug conspiracy. As a part of that conspiracy, he Can be charged with actions taken by other people in the furtherance of the conspiracy. for example, if, in order to get the plane to bring the drugs over, the pilot had to steal the plane. In this case, Freddie could be held liable for the theft of the plane.

Now let’s move Freddy to a position a little more removed. Let’s say that he was not aware that the reason he was supposed to move the plane was because of the delivery of drugs. However, it turns out that the circumstances in which Freddy met with the drug delivery man were so suspicious that he really should have known what was going on. In fact, it is difficult to believe that he did not know what was going on. This is when the federal theory of “willful blindness” comes into play. Another way to put “willful blindness” is to say “looking the other way”. To break it down further, the law considers taking an attitude like “look, don’t tell me. I don’t want to know.” as just about as good as knowingly and willingly joining in the conspiracy.

I actually handled one such case in federal court in Boston. We were fortunate enough to win that trial. Others, similarly situated, were not. The bottom line is that these theories have teeth. They can bring about a conviction.

We began this topic by discussing the federal multi defendant bust which recently took place. I was talking about becoming nervous when people not involved in an alleged criminal conspiracy are swept up in the large scale fancy named operation to attack the conspiracy.

Let’s say that Jerry Janitor works at a particular school in Boston. He opens and closes the building. Occasionally, Donnie and Dorena Drugdealer use the basement when the building is closed to prepare drugs for sale. On this particular night, Connie Conspirator started flirting with Jerry and invited him out for drinks. She is so intoxicating herself, that she is able to distract him from remembering to lock up the school building when he leaves at night. Donnie and Darina go into the building and begin to work. An hour or so later, the police raid takes place. Darina and Donnie are, of coarse, arrested.

But now, the police want to know how they got into the building. They learned that Jerry was supposed to have locked up the building but, this particular night, he failed to do so. Jerry explains about the beautiful Connie. However, the investigators are unimpressed. They decide that he left the building unlocked so that the drug dealers could come in. Therefore, he is Considered part of the conspiracy.

“But Sam, is there really enough to convict Jerry?”

Continue reading

As you have probably heard, there was a rather large federal bust which took place toward the end of last week. When the dust settled, thirty people were facing charges in a crackdown on two street gangs who allegedly terrorized folks in the Bowdoin-Geneva section of Dorchester as well as the Uphams Corner section of Roxbury.

The federal prosecutor, who was facing her own bad press at the moment, released the statement, “This community has been in desperate need of reprieve from the violence. We hope the arrests and prosecution of the defendants will quiet the streets and improve the quality of life for all residents.”

As you undoubtedly know, there has been a rash of violence taking place on the Boston-area streets and this massive bust has probably been in the works for a long time. In fact, United States Attorney Carmen Ortiz revealed that over 300 law enforcement officers (ranging from federal to local agencies) executed search warrants and made arrests in what officials have named “Operation Concord”. The operation focused on violence and drug distribution by the Woodward Avenue and Hendry Street gangs, prosecutors said. It dated back to drug traffic in the summer of 2011.

Most of the people arrested were arrested locally. Two were already in custody, one was arrested in California and one in Maine. One last one is still a fugitive.

According to law enforcement, those arrested were allegedly involved in gang, gun, and drug activity. They were allegedly controlled by two young men believed to be leaders of the Hendry Street gang and the Woodward Avenue Gang. These leaders were allegedly responsible for distribution of large amounts of crack cocaine, oxycodone pills, and marijuana.
All of the defendants have been held without bail.

The Reverend Richard “Doc” Conway, a Dorchester Catholic priest whose parish includes some of the streets affected, said he was relieved to hear police had moved to arrest violent gang members from the area.

“Any time you get guns off the streets that’s a plus,” he said. “And when you cut down rivalries between gangs and get the leaders off the street, that’s good for the neighborhood.”
Emmett Folgert, who runs the Dorchester Youth Collaborative in Fields Corner, said busting up two major gangs could have a ripple effect on smaller groups that often take their cues from older gang leaders.

Major arrests of gang leaders impact “not only the areas that these guys were operating out of but areas where their rivals are,” Folgert said. “It turns the temperature down. It’s a multiplier effect.”

Mayor Thomas M. Menino called it “a great day for the hardworking people of Bowdoin-Geneva and Uphams Corner.”

So…everyone, other than those arrested, see the mass arrest as a good thing.

But I’ve got to wonder…
Continue reading

It is every parent’s nightmare and it harkens back to a similar high-profile homicide trial from years ago. That one was in Middlesex County as well.

This time it is Medford where dwelt a 34-year-old nanny, Aisling McCarthy Brady (hereinafter, the “Defendant”). Now, she stands accused of assault and is likely to see homicide charges herself. The proposed victim is a 1-year-old girl who was under her care. The girl has since died.

According to the Commonwealth, the Defendant attacked the baby on the baby’s first birthday early last week. The baby died two days later. Prosecutors allege that the baby suffered “massive brain swelling” as a result of being assaulted by the Defendant. The child was then rushed to Children’s Hospital Boston, where she was pronounced dead.

In court today at the Defendant’s arraignment, the Commonwealth described how it contends the baby’s injuries came about. It described the baby as a “healthy, normal, well-baby” who woke around 8 a.m. and was cared for by her mother and the Defendant.

The mother is said to have left the home around 9:30 a.m., leaving the infant in the sole care of the Defendant. The child napped from about 10 a.m. to about 1:15 p.m., the prosecutor said. At 4:42pm, the Defendant called 911 and asked for medical help.

“It is very clear the only person who had contact with this child at the time of the injuries [on Jan. 14] was the defendant,” argued the prosecutor.

Defense counsel, however, argued that there was more to the story. She argued that, in recent weeks, the baby had been traveling overseas which included stops in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. “Who knows what could have happened?” defense counsel argued. The defense went on to say that when the child returned to the United States, she was diagnosed as suffering from malnutrition.
Continue reading

Contact Information